Link market and technology signals to your innovation portfolio


Portfolio reviews look inward: budget, timeline, health status. Yet projects often fail because the market or the technology moved while the project stayed on plan. Foresight and portfolio teams usually work in separate tools, so that connection is rarely made.
Hand the connection to Prism. It reads each project’s description and goals, searches recent external signals, and says whether they support or threaten the project. For each project, it recommends whether to accelerate, pivot or review. Projects with no relevant signal are marked for review by default, rather than given an invented finding.
Required inputs
19 projects checked against external signals from the last six months. Six show a material change. Prism recommends accelerating 7 and reviewing 12.
Project | Strongest signal | Effect | Suggestion |
|---|---|---|---|
Coated paper wrappers to replace plastic film on chocolate bars | EU ban on PFAS in food-contact packaging now applies, including coatings | Threatens, unless the coating is PFAS-free | Accelerate, with PFAS-free coating evidence |
Ready-to-drink matcha range | Raw matcha prices at record highs as demand outpaces supply | Threatens margins | Review margins and sourcing |
Lightweight aluminium can redesign | Aluminium price volatility and tariffs raise can costs | Supports | Accelerate |
Mono-material snack pouches | EU packaging rules now apply, with recyclability grades to follow | Supports | Accelerate |
Electrolyte drink line | Electrolyte and low-sugar drinks keep gaining share of hydration drinks | Supports, with pressure from cheaper private labels | Accelerate, differentiating on clean label |
Follow-up prompts: