Build a panel of virtual AI experts to review ideas and projects


Good reviews need the right expert at the right moment: a devil’s advocate, a domain specialist, someone who knows your business practices, a presentation coach. Those people are scarce, and a generic AI review sounds the same for every idea.
Hand the reviews to Prism. Build your experts once, as elements: create an element type for experts and write each persona into it, with its role, what to look for, tone and the format of the answer. Then name one or more experts in a prompt, together with the idea, project or technology they should work on. Each expert reviews from its own angle, and Prism brings the results together.
Required inputs
Review of the idea “Shared tool pool across plants” by three virtual experts, each following its own instructions, then three improvements they agree on and a revised description.
Expert | Main point |
|---|---|
Devil's Advocate | Most damaging objection: many fixtures are part-specific or owned by the car maker, so they can’t move between plants without consent. If most idle tools are like this, the idea fails. |
Business Practice Advisor | The text describes a symptom, idle tools, not a root cause. Only one plant has been observed, and the 20 to 30% saving has no baseline. First question: what share of the tools are generic, and which overlap between plants? |
Presentation Coach | The ask is buried and hedged. Open with one concrete fact about idle tools and close with a specific pilot request. |
Recommended improvements: replace the guess with a baseline from Zaragoza and at least one more plant; limit the pilot to generic fixtures and measuring gauges, excluding customer-owned and part-specific tools; and present a net case with a clear ask.
Follow-up prompts: